A I is just really fast throwing pizza doughs on the wall to see which ones “stick”. You still need human beanz filters to sort out the chocolate coated tunas from the tuna melts and tuna with mayonnaise. And no matter how high the resolution and frequency of sample rates, it will for Ever 🐝 dot to dot connected approximations. A I singularity is doubled down Scientism Peter Pan Fantasy. With the Atheist Peter Pan fantasy as it’s childish basis. Once you pseudo science base facts on fantasies all manor of men can have babies magic is possible. Truth can’t contradict Truth. And a square can’t be a circle.
Linear time only moves forwards. In s random Atheist universe, it would jump backwards and even pause, randomly. In an Atheist Universe, harmonics would randomly decay into Atheist gibberish. Language and music would not be possible. In a random Atheist universe, there would not be reliable repeatability maintained over linear time. To support real science via the repeatable scientific methodology.
Having successfully deBunked Atheism, Clock Maker God and “God of the Gaps”, God is, Q.E.D.
Every time you hear Ave Maria repeated succesfully, that is scientific proof of God.,A. I. then, is just another Dual Use tool. Guided by zero morals and ethics psycoPaths it amplifies Evil. But used in the guidelines of Divine Morals and Ethics it becomes a bonus for humanity. Same as all technology. Pray or 🐝 prey.
I had a lot of trouble following your thoughts, so I had ChatGPT do a close paraphrase. OK, I agree on some points, disagree on others.
________________________________________
Sentence-by-Sentence Close Paraphrase
1. AI works quickly, trying many ideas or outputs, akin to throwing pizza dough at a wall to see what stays.
2. Humans are required to filter AI's results to differentiate between absurd outcomes (like chocolate-covered tuna) and sensible or acceptable ones (like tuna melts or tuna with mayonnaise).
3. No matter how advanced AI's processing gets, it will always rely on connecting points or approximating rather than fully understanding.
4. The idea of an AI singularity (AI achieving superhuman intelligence) is dismissed as a fantastical belief stemming from a "scientism" perspective.
5. The AI singularity concept is linked to atheistic beliefs, which are described as "childish fantasies."
6. Basing supposed science on fantasies leads to absurd or impossible ideas, such as men giving birth.
7. A statement that truth is consistent and cannot be self-contradictory.
8. This example reinforces the idea that logical absolutes exist and cannot be violated.
9. Time, as understood, moves forward in a linear fashion.
10. If the universe were truly random (as atheism is claimed to suggest), time might behave unpredictably, such as moving backward or stopping.
11. In a random universe without purpose, systems like harmonics (e.g., music) would degrade into meaningless chaos.
12. The existence of structured systems like language and music is argued to be incompatible with a random, atheistic universe.
13. A random universe would lack the consistency and repeatability required for scientific principles to function.
14. Reliable repeatability is necessary to uphold real science and its methodologies.
15. The author claims to have disproven atheism and certain theological concepts like the "Clockmaker God" and "God of the Gaps," concluding that God's existence is self-evident ("Q.E.D."—quod erat demonstrandum).
16. The repeated success of something harmonious or ordered, like "Ave Maria," is presented as evidence for God's existence.
17. AI is described as a neutral tool that can have both positive and negative applications.
18. If controlled by unethical individuals (described as "psychopaths"), AI can be used to amplify harm or evil.
19. Conversely, when AI operates within the boundaries of divine morals and ethics, it can benefit humanity.
20. This point extends the moral neutrality of AI to all forms of technology, implying that their impact depends on how they are used.
21. A closing statement urging spiritual or moral alignment, suggesting that failing to "pray" (seek divine guidance) leads to vulnerability or harm ("prey").
Concise Paraphrased Summary
• AI is a fast trial-and-error tool that depends on human oversight to filter its outputs. It is limited to approximations and cannot achieve full understanding.
• The idea of an AI singularity is dismissed as a fantasy rooted in atheism, which is criticized for being inconsistent with the order and repeatability required for science.
• The author argues that belief in God provides the necessary foundation for science and order, contrasting it with a random atheistic universe where time, harmonics, and language would break down.
• AI, like all technology, is morally neutral and can amplify either harm or good, depending on the ethics of its users. The text concludes by emphasizing the importance of divine morals and spiritual guidance.
Interesting! So now the copy of a copy of intelligence is your base line “facts checker”? Is that correct? You, and image of God’s intelligence, which samples reality at 5 frames per microsecond (a dot to dot approximation of reality) are using now a Copy Approximation of Human Intelligence. As a fact checker. 🙃🧐🧐🧐
Good Luck with your Coded in Coded out Copy of a Copy fact checkering. No bias in that, right? .
All technology is dual use. In the hands os aMoral psychopaths it amplifies evil. And in the hands of Divine guidance it helps humanity.
Fun experiment though, Kudos for trying it. Pro Tip, Einstein and Bohr could have saved 30 years of debating God or 🎲🎲🎲 by listening to Max Planck. Instead of Einstein’s Box of Light MIND experiment neither was able to solve from inside space and the delusion that linear time is reality (even Hawking proved Infinity is reality and linear time is scientifically impossible with a beginning and an ending). “It is not possible to solve the ultimate mystery with the human mind. When the Mind is part of the mystery we are trying to solve.”~ Max Plank
Ergo, if we need to transcend Human Mind calculations of analog to digital inputs framed into the movie of Life at 5 frames per microsecond (Unless over ridden to the Reptilian Brain Amygdala by the death and aging hormones Adrenaline and Cortisol), to solve the Box of Light Mind experiment. How in the whurl will a copy of the sample rate movie framing intelligence solve these final mysteries. Clearly to the most causal of observers, sample rates of sample rates can never ever equal Singularity of Absolute reality. Even Human Intelligence before copying it artificially is only a sampled approximation. There for ever will be a Faith Gap between human calculations of the Mind, and the Absolute Reality of our Creator, God. A I might be a faster mouse trap. But it is only a copy of a copy. That still needs human guidance after human coding. To point towards destructive Evil or constructive coherent good. And human intelligence endowed by our creator with free will, also needs Divine guidance for the same duality reasons.
A computer can never know the mind of Steve Jobs. Steve Jobs can never know the mind of God. But Steve Jobs can accept the Dominion of God and reunite Sans Human fallibilities and computational short comings. Which is the difference between humans and computers. And the Peter Pan fantasy whirl of TransHumans in their childish cloud servers.
“If you think you understand, it’s Not God.”~ St Augustine
Pray or be prey, God Bless all with Divine Guidance, 🙏🙏🙏
You obviously did not read my article or my comment with any comprehension. By the way, your arguments are not arguments, they are assertions of your belief. I do not share those beliefs. Word Salad seems to be your mode. I can't regard you as a serious thinker.
A I is just really fast throwing pizza doughs on the wall to see which ones “stick”. You still need human beanz filters to sort out the chocolate coated tunas from the tuna melts and tuna with mayonnaise. And no matter how high the resolution and frequency of sample rates, it will for Ever 🐝 dot to dot connected approximations. A I singularity is doubled down Scientism Peter Pan Fantasy. With the Atheist Peter Pan fantasy as it’s childish basis. Once you pseudo science base facts on fantasies all manor of men can have babies magic is possible. Truth can’t contradict Truth. And a square can’t be a circle.
Linear time only moves forwards. In s random Atheist universe, it would jump backwards and even pause, randomly. In an Atheist Universe, harmonics would randomly decay into Atheist gibberish. Language and music would not be possible. In a random Atheist universe, there would not be reliable repeatability maintained over linear time. To support real science via the repeatable scientific methodology.
Having successfully deBunked Atheism, Clock Maker God and “God of the Gaps”, God is, Q.E.D.
Every time you hear Ave Maria repeated succesfully, that is scientific proof of God.,A. I. then, is just another Dual Use tool. Guided by zero morals and ethics psycoPaths it amplifies Evil. But used in the guidelines of Divine Morals and Ethics it becomes a bonus for humanity. Same as all technology. Pray or 🐝 prey.
I had a lot of trouble following your thoughts, so I had ChatGPT do a close paraphrase. OK, I agree on some points, disagree on others.
________________________________________
Sentence-by-Sentence Close Paraphrase
1. AI works quickly, trying many ideas or outputs, akin to throwing pizza dough at a wall to see what stays.
2. Humans are required to filter AI's results to differentiate between absurd outcomes (like chocolate-covered tuna) and sensible or acceptable ones (like tuna melts or tuna with mayonnaise).
3. No matter how advanced AI's processing gets, it will always rely on connecting points or approximating rather than fully understanding.
4. The idea of an AI singularity (AI achieving superhuman intelligence) is dismissed as a fantastical belief stemming from a "scientism" perspective.
5. The AI singularity concept is linked to atheistic beliefs, which are described as "childish fantasies."
6. Basing supposed science on fantasies leads to absurd or impossible ideas, such as men giving birth.
7. A statement that truth is consistent and cannot be self-contradictory.
8. This example reinforces the idea that logical absolutes exist and cannot be violated.
9. Time, as understood, moves forward in a linear fashion.
10. If the universe were truly random (as atheism is claimed to suggest), time might behave unpredictably, such as moving backward or stopping.
11. In a random universe without purpose, systems like harmonics (e.g., music) would degrade into meaningless chaos.
12. The existence of structured systems like language and music is argued to be incompatible with a random, atheistic universe.
13. A random universe would lack the consistency and repeatability required for scientific principles to function.
14. Reliable repeatability is necessary to uphold real science and its methodologies.
15. The author claims to have disproven atheism and certain theological concepts like the "Clockmaker God" and "God of the Gaps," concluding that God's existence is self-evident ("Q.E.D."—quod erat demonstrandum).
16. The repeated success of something harmonious or ordered, like "Ave Maria," is presented as evidence for God's existence.
17. AI is described as a neutral tool that can have both positive and negative applications.
18. If controlled by unethical individuals (described as "psychopaths"), AI can be used to amplify harm or evil.
19. Conversely, when AI operates within the boundaries of divine morals and ethics, it can benefit humanity.
20. This point extends the moral neutrality of AI to all forms of technology, implying that their impact depends on how they are used.
21. A closing statement urging spiritual or moral alignment, suggesting that failing to "pray" (seek divine guidance) leads to vulnerability or harm ("prey").
Concise Paraphrased Summary
• AI is a fast trial-and-error tool that depends on human oversight to filter its outputs. It is limited to approximations and cannot achieve full understanding.
• The idea of an AI singularity is dismissed as a fantasy rooted in atheism, which is criticized for being inconsistent with the order and repeatability required for science.
• The author argues that belief in God provides the necessary foundation for science and order, contrasting it with a random atheistic universe where time, harmonics, and language would break down.
• AI, like all technology, is morally neutral and can amplify either harm or good, depending on the ethics of its users. The text concludes by emphasizing the importance of divine morals and spiritual guidance.
Interesting! So now the copy of a copy of intelligence is your base line “facts checker”? Is that correct? You, and image of God’s intelligence, which samples reality at 5 frames per microsecond (a dot to dot approximation of reality) are using now a Copy Approximation of Human Intelligence. As a fact checker. 🙃🧐🧐🧐
Good Luck with your Coded in Coded out Copy of a Copy fact checkering. No bias in that, right? .
All technology is dual use. In the hands os aMoral psychopaths it amplifies evil. And in the hands of Divine guidance it helps humanity.
Fun experiment though, Kudos for trying it. Pro Tip, Einstein and Bohr could have saved 30 years of debating God or 🎲🎲🎲 by listening to Max Planck. Instead of Einstein’s Box of Light MIND experiment neither was able to solve from inside space and the delusion that linear time is reality (even Hawking proved Infinity is reality and linear time is scientifically impossible with a beginning and an ending). “It is not possible to solve the ultimate mystery with the human mind. When the Mind is part of the mystery we are trying to solve.”~ Max Plank
Ergo, if we need to transcend Human Mind calculations of analog to digital inputs framed into the movie of Life at 5 frames per microsecond (Unless over ridden to the Reptilian Brain Amygdala by the death and aging hormones Adrenaline and Cortisol), to solve the Box of Light Mind experiment. How in the whurl will a copy of the sample rate movie framing intelligence solve these final mysteries. Clearly to the most causal of observers, sample rates of sample rates can never ever equal Singularity of Absolute reality. Even Human Intelligence before copying it artificially is only a sampled approximation. There for ever will be a Faith Gap between human calculations of the Mind, and the Absolute Reality of our Creator, God. A I might be a faster mouse trap. But it is only a copy of a copy. That still needs human guidance after human coding. To point towards destructive Evil or constructive coherent good. And human intelligence endowed by our creator with free will, also needs Divine guidance for the same duality reasons.
A computer can never know the mind of Steve Jobs. Steve Jobs can never know the mind of God. But Steve Jobs can accept the Dominion of God and reunite Sans Human fallibilities and computational short comings. Which is the difference between humans and computers. And the Peter Pan fantasy whirl of TransHumans in their childish cloud servers.
“If you think you understand, it’s Not God.”~ St Augustine
Pray or be prey, God Bless all with Divine Guidance, 🙏🙏🙏
You obviously did not read my article or my comment with any comprehension. By the way, your arguments are not arguments, they are assertions of your belief. I do not share those beliefs. Word Salad seems to be your mode. I can't regard you as a serious thinker.