Once again, I opine beyond my pay grade. I expect I am wrong, at least in details, but maybe the overall thrust is correct. Other’s are often wrong, why should I be any different? I present my case.
In paragraph "Do not confuse the inner world of language and explanation ... that was someone else’s invention" I am not sure I understand the last sentence. A couple of sentences above the text states categorically that the outer world is deterministic. If that is so what is the point of stating "I did not say the world was not deterministic"? Who is this "someone else"? Are we talking about free will (which implies an eternal human soul which implies eventual resurrection)?
Hello!
In paragraph "Do not confuse the inner world of language and explanation ... that was someone else’s invention" I am not sure I understand the last sentence. A couple of sentences above the text states categorically that the outer world is deterministic. If that is so what is the point of stating "I did not say the world was not deterministic"? Who is this "someone else"? Are we talking about free will (which implies an eternal human soul which implies eventual resurrection)?
Agreed. Either unclear words and perhaps unclear thoughts. I will have to revise it.