Crosspost with Extensive Summary: What Happens to Vaccine Clinical Trial Participants?
Navigating an Abusive Relationship With Big Pharma A Midwestern Doctor
“Almost every abusive relationship follows a similar pattern: the abusive partner lures the abused party into the relationship with lavish promises, and then once they are ensnared, finds reasons to renege on those promises and justifications to be a little bit abusive. The abused party will try to resist this shift, but the abuser will find some way to overcome that resistance (e.g., they will gaslight the partner into believing the abuse isn’t even happening).” — A Midwestern Doctor
What Happens to Vaccine Clinical Trial Participants?
Summary by ChatGPT 3.5
Are Vaccine Trials Abusive?
The text draws a parallel between abusive relationships and vaccine clinical trials. It highlights how participants can be enticed with promises, manipulated, and gaslighted when adverse effects occur. The cycle of abuse continues as participants' concerns are dismissed, injuries are underreported, and support is lacking. The author emphasizes the importance of recognizing and addressing abusive dynamics in vaccine trials.
Creeping Obligations
The text discusses a pattern in personal relationships where expectations and demands gradually escalate, leading to conflicts. The author shares their strategy of sidestepping obligations to avoid being trapped in such dynamics. The pattern is extended to societal dynamics, exemplified by incremental imposition of extreme measures, such as COVID-19 restrictions. The text raises concerns about the potential for climate lockdowns as a continuation of this pattern.
Pharmaceutical Industry: AZT and Abuse
The text accuses the pharmaceutical industry, particularly Dr. Fauci, of unethical practices during the AIDS epidemic and the COVID-19 pandemic. It alleges withholding effective treatments and promoting ineffective drugs for financial gain. The author claims that trial participant injuries were covered up to facilitate the approval and usage of drugs like AZT and vaccines.
Pharmaceutical Industry: SSRI and Abuse
The text raises concerns about the approval process and handling of the first selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) antidepressant, Prozac. It alleges issues with safety, efficacy, and research fraud. The FDA is accused of suppressing reports on severe side effects and downplaying safety concerns. The text draws parallels between the FDA's actions during the Prozac trials and the current situation with COVID-19 vaccines.
Pharmaceutical Industry: Gardasil and Abuse
The text discusses concerns about the safety and reporting of adverse events associated with the HPV vaccine, Gardasil. It highlights discrepancies in the reporting rates, underreporting, and dismissive treatment of adverse effects. The text suggests a lack of transparency and ethical practices in the way the trials were conducted.
The Most Harmful Vaccines Ever
The text asserts that smallpox, anthrax, HPV, and COVID-19 vaccines are the most harmful vaccines introduced. It raises concerns about red flags and the dismissal of adverse effects. The text emphasizes the need for better evaluation of safety data from clinical trials.
Poor Treatment of Clinical Trial Participants
The text describes a pattern observed in clinical trials, where participants are misled, gaslighted, and their adverse events are dismissed. It highlights the author's experiences with the HPV vaccine and observations from COVID-19 trials. The text suggests systemic issues in the treatment of trial participants and the need for oversight and accountability.
A Book on HPV Trials
The text discusses a book that sheds light on the experiences of participants in the HPV vaccine trials. It recounts the stories of Kesia and Sesilje, highlighting issues such as misleading participants, dismissal of adverse effects, inadequate data collection, and downplaying significant medical conditions. The book reveals deficiencies and ethical concerns in the HPV vaccine trials.
Problems with the Science
The text questions the extent to which antibody responses in vaccine trials truly confer protection. It suggests that the focus on eliciting a strong antibody response may lead to the use of more potent adjuvants with significant side effects. The text raises concerns about the COVID-19 vaccines' approach of flooding the body with spike proteins and suggests a link to the design of the HPV vaccine.
More from the Book on HPV
The text introduces Sesilje's story, a participant in the HPV vaccine trial who received the placebo. It highlights her experiences, discrepancies in the placebo used, and the potential implications of receiving aluminum in the placebo and vaccine.
Discussion of the Book
The text discusses the dismissal of participants' concerns and the use of an aluminum-containing placebo in the HPV vaccine trials. It raises questions about trial integrity, transparency, and the need for independent monitoring and investigation of adverse effects. The passage emphasizes the importance of participant safety and accountability in the clinical trial process.
HPV and Covid-19 Vaccine Trial Skulduggery
The text compares the HPV and COVID-19 vaccine trials, highlighting issues of data manipulation, underreporting of adverse events, gaslighting of participants, and lack of support. It criticizes the FDA's inaction in addressing complaints from whistleblowers and emphasizes the need for transparency, accountability, and participant rights in vaccine trials.