Crosspost: Perspective, Values, and the COVID Crisis
Root cause analysis of the Ontological Shock many have experienced, by Dr. Robert Malone, Jul 8, 2023
“Ethics. My big Ontological Shocks have all been about ethics. One of my top values is to strive to act ethically, and to surround myself with ethical people.” — Dr. Robert Malone
Summary by ChatGPT
The author, Robert W. Malone, reflects on his experiences and the root causes of the "Ontological Shock" many people have experienced during the COVID-19 crisis. He mentions his involvement with the "Americas Frontline Doctors" protest, which opposed the official narrative and actions promoted by the US Government and other organizations. He emphasizes that the narrative and actions of the government and the World Health Organization (WHO) during the crisis have been largely incorrect.
Malone discusses the planned follow-up event organized by Dr. Simone Gold, where various speakers will address different aspects of the COVID-19 response aligned with their expertise. Malone's expertise lies in mRNA vaccine technology, and he is asked to give two talks, one specifically focused on summarizing the overall arc of the COVID-19 crisis.
While contemplating the theme for his talk, Malone realizes that his "Ontological Shock" was rooted in ethics. He recounts various incidents that contributed to his shock, including the denial of adverse events related to mRNA vaccines, lies surrounding Famotidine clinical trials, attempts to diminish his scientific achievements, and the spread of misinformation by public health officials and the media. He also highlights the unethical actions taken by the government, WHO, and other organizations, such as deploying military-grade psy-ops, censorship, and manipulation of public opinion.
Malone concludes that the COVID-19 crisis has exposed a world where government propaganda, information control, and mind control have become normalized. He argues that ethics and ethical boundaries have been disregarded in pursuit of power and hidden agendas. He criticizes the intelligence community for its unethical activities and suggests that the fusion of the Administrative State and the Intelligence Community threatens the American experiment in self-governance.
The author expresses uncertainty about the future and questions whether the American experiment will survive or if individuals will retreat into "intentional communities" amidst the forces of Woke culture and globalism. He acknowledges the wickedness deployed against him and others but asserts his commitment to asking questions and seeking answers.